That proved to be important, both to Valdez's statline and the game's outcome, as Alvarez homered in the subsequent half-iinning. It's worth noting that Valdez departed after loading the bases reliever Hector Neris induced a threat-ending groundout to keep the deficit at one. Valdez struck out six of the 24 batters he faced.Ĭombine Castillo and Valdez's lines and you get the following: 12 2/3 innings, nine hits, five runs (four earned), three walks, and 13 strikeouts. To that point, he had surrendered two runs (albeit only one earned) on four hits and three walks. Valdez, for his part, exited with two outs in the sixth inning. (All three runs scored on home runs, Alvarez's and a solo shot hit by Kyle Tucker earlier in the game.) Castillo also struck out seven batters and continued to show increased velocity. He threw seven innings before giving way to the M's bullpen, permitting three runs on five hits and no walks. They may not have traded zeroes throughout the afternoon, but each delivered a solid performance all the same.Ĭastillo was acquired by the Mariners from the Cincinnati Reds at the trade deadline for starts like these. On paper, Luis Castillo and Framber Valdez looked like a potential pitcher's duel between aces. It didn't end up mattering (though the Mariners did bring the tying run to the plate on two occasions in the ninth), but it may speak to Servais and company taking a more conservative approach to facing Alvarez heading forward. Servais and the Mariners would pay for the decision, as Alex Bregman singled in an insurance run. The IBB came with a runner on first and two outs in the inning, meaning Seattle manager Scott Servais violated one of the analytical rules of thumb when it comes to intentional walks: never issue one to advance a runner. The Mariners, presumably tired of getting beat by Alvarez, decided to walk him intentionally in the bottom of the eighth inning. He added a very important number to that column on Thursday. 291/.396/.496 slash line and four home runs in 35 postseason contests. To date, the total recorded for 2023 is $853 million, 36.9% more than in 2022, and more than in any other year.Alvarez's blast, for those wondering, traveled 371 feet and had an exit velocity of 103.6 mph, according to Statcast.Īlvarez entered Thursday with a career. Both figures set a new record, with an increase of 19.1% and 83.3%, respectively," explained García Silvero.Īlso, $696.6 million in agent fees were paid during this transfer period, another record figure. A total of 829 transfers were recorded, of which 66 generated transfer fees. "The total number of transfers during the mid-year registration period has also increased for the sixth consecutive year. Germany tops the list in terms of the number of transfers made (55), while France leads in the number of players transferred out (53). There was also an unprecedented surge in transfer spending in women's soccer, more than doubling compared to the mid-year transfer window of 2022 and reaching the historic figure of $3 million.Įurope once again led the way, with 634 signings and 565 players transferred. Money from Saudi Arabia is one of the main reasons why AFC clubs have generated 14% of the total market, the first time a non-UEFA confederation has exceeded 10%. They are followed by France ($859.7 million), Germany ($762.4 million), Italy ($711 million) and Spain ($405.6 million). Arab soccer, second place in transfersĮngland even surpassed the transfers made by teams in Saudi Arabia, which finished second on the list with a total investment of $875.4 million. "This is the first time that clubs from a single federation have received more than $1 billion during the mid-year transfer window," said Emilio Garcia Silvero, director of FIFA's Legal Services and Compliance Division. However, Germany recorded the highest amount of transfer income ($1.11 billion)," the report states. "England's Premier League topped the list for transfer spending ($1.98 billion) and the number of signings made (449) and players transferred (514). FIFA are reporting that between June 1 and September 1, transfer spending reached an all-time high of $7.36 billion, up 26.8% from the previous record set in 2019, and up 47.2% compared to the same period in 2022.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |